All branches of my family and friends have been questioning techforgood over 70 years now- by which we mean what dad with Economist audiences of 1970s first coined as entrepreneurial revolution: every next child flourishing because every community being invested in through servant leaders and SME innovators- if that's your kind of collaboration please get in touch MA Stats DAMTP Corpus Christi Cambridge -- currently in Wash DC & Glasgow; as Scots missionaries my parents who served in world war 2 hoped that was the end of tech for the few instead of tech and teach for all.. we're also prepping June 2023 Glasgow as 265th moral sentiments summit on purposes of markets and engineering. WE see 2020s web3 alumni as best chance to cure tragedies of fake media, AND celebrate millennials as first Sustainability Gen -huge thanks to ,, and other benchmarks at - and of course mathematicians like Satoshi since 2008WHY 163? London Scot James Wilson having founded The Economist in 1843, convinced Queen Victoria to launch commonwealth round a bank by and for the quarter of peoples on the India subcontinent. 163 year ago: she told him to go create Charter Bank; arriving in Calcutta 1860 Wilson died within 9 months of diarrhea. Local peoples had to wait another 112+ years until a womens bank was launched by Fazle Abed making end of diarrhea by oral rehydration one of its first educational purposes My father Norman was very lucky. He survived world war 2 as a teenage navigator allied bomber command Burma. Six years later he met V Neuman at Princeton who unluckily only had 6 years left due to cancer from nuclear bombsd. Neuman asked dad will train economist jouranlits to ask the most valuable question in the world: what goods will people do with 100 tukes more etch every decade 1930s to 2020s. Dad and numann had plenty of exambples of bads caused by rapid tech. I was born the same year 1951. To be honest it took me really long time to start to understand dad's next question about what he called peoples entrepreneurial revolution. But he made it clear that community griunded finacing and valuation of tecahers would be make or braeak to 21st c life. So lets start there

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

londons stock - listings market

 lord hill report march 2021


Why do we need to act? Although listing on the premium listing segment of the FCA’s Official List has historically been globally recognised as a mark of quality for companies, the figures paint a stark picture: between 2015 and 2020, London accounted for only 5% of IPOs globally.1 The number of listed companies in the UK has fallen by about 40% from a recent peak in 2008. Commentary about increased flows of business to Amsterdam make the point that we face stiff competition as a financial centre not just from the US and Asia, but from elsewhere in Europe. One look at the composition of the FTSE index makes clear another challenge: the most significant companies listed in London are either financial or more representative of the ‘old economy’ than the companies of the future. At one point last 1 LSE for listed companies and Dealogic for share of global IPOs Letter to the Chancellor UK Listing Review  2 summer, Apple alone was worth more than the combined value of every company in the FTSE 100.2 Although the UK has great strengths in technology and life sciences, too few of the innovations we have seen have led ultimately to UK companies coming to the public markets in London. Today, we can see the possibilities offered by the strong potential pipeline of tech IPOs if we are able to persuade them of the many advantages of listing in London. We cannot afford to miss the opportunity that this represents either for our future as a financial centre or as a source of returns for investors large and small

No comments:

Post a Comment